A. Scenarios in Hong Kong
Company A advertised a conference table for sale for $50,000 in a local daily newspaper. They received one telephone call in response to the advertisement, and the manager of Company A arranged to meet the caller, the representative of Company B, at the showroom of Company A. Having inspected the conference table, the representative of Company B said that Company B would buy it but that they would need time to arrange the payment. Before leaving the showroom, the manager of Company A and the representative shook hands and exchanged business cards. Three days later, the representative of Company B telephoned the manager of Company A to say that he would deliver the cash to Company A the next day. The manager of Company A said nothing in response. Can the manager of Company A refuse to sell the conference table to Company B when the representative of Company B arrives at the showroom of Company A with the $50,000?
The manager of Company A, a printing company, ordered a new colour printing machine from Company B to be delivered on 1 November. The machine was not delivered on time, but because there is a low demand for printing services between November and February, the manager of Company A did not contact Company B about the matter until 20 February of the next year, when he sent a fax to Company B enquiring about delivery of the machine. He was told by return fax that the machine would be delivered the following week. However, the machine was not delivered for another three months. Since the time when the manager of Company A enquired about the delivery of the machine, Company A has only been able to fulfil 50% of the printing jobs that it could have handled had they had the machine.
Can Company A purchase the printing machine from another manufacturer and sue Company B for damages (compensation)? Would the basis for the calculation of the damages be different if Company A had also lost a profitable printing order because they were not able to meet the deadline for delivering the work without the new machine?
Mr. A and his brother Mr. B were partners in a garment manufacturing company business for many years. On the advice of their accountant, they formed a limited company (A & B Ltd) and invited Mr. B’s son to join them in the business. It was agreed that Mr. A and Mr. B would each hold 40% of the shares and that B’s son would hold the remaining 20%. Recently, Mr. A and Mr. B have been unable to agree on the design, quality of fabric or colour of their products, and consequently have neglected the business. They have failed to pay their suppliers and are unable to fulfil their contracted orders. Mr. B’s son always agrees with his father. As a result, Mr. A now refuses to communicate with either of them. Are there any grounds on which A & B Ltd can be wound up by the court?